Hey all,
After watching Videograms of a Revolution by Harun Farouki and Andrej Ujica, I was shocked to learn about an historical event that I had never heard of. These particularly violent string of events occured in Bucharest towards the end of Communist rule in the Eastern bloc. The Romanian president of that time, Nicolae Ceausescu, was guilty of 25 years of corruption and apathy towards his own country. After a successful coup, Nicolae and his wife Elena were summarily executed by firing squad.
Moments after watching this eye-opening documentary about the Romanian Revolution of 1989, my fellow coursemates and I were instructed to write about how television played a pivotal part in the week-long bloody uprising. So here we go:
First of all, it was interesting to note that state television was used both by Nicolae and the prostestors as an important media vehicle; a channel used to convey messages and information to their 'receivers', the masses. Nicolae frequently used the TV station as his main tool of spreading socialist propaganda. However, the airing of his last mass rally that was disrupted by the cracks of gunfire by the Securitate, signalled the beginning of the revolution the end of his dictatorship.
Eventual leaders of the new regime also utilised television, albeit differently, as a means of delivering the 'truth' and to inform the population that liberation had been achieved. With the old communist government overthrown, the National Salvation Front (FSN) needed the media and the military as important allies to help establish a new order in the country, a democratic one.
Besides announcing the victorious march to Palace Square, the occupation of the Central Committee building and the fleeing of Nicolae and his underlings, the dissidents used television as a stage to exhibit the enemies of the state, including Nicu Ceausescu, Nicolae's son and a bloodied man who was accused of trying to sneak into the TV station and assassinate the leaders responsible for the coup.
Television crew was also rushed to the scene where millions of people celebrated the fall of Nicolae and the re-birth of their beloved country in Palace Square. In order to assure the millions of people glued to their television screens of absolute victory, television helped spread the cheer to countless households across the nation by broadcasting scenes of people waving the Romanian flag with its coat of arms torn of cut off, not to mention speeches made by the revolutionaries standing on the podium where Nicolae used to make his own.
When 'terrorist forces', armed units still loyal to Nicolae attacked the vital points of socio-political life: the television, radio, and telephone buildings, the prostestors holed up in the TV station were quick to react by urging the public not to worry and stated that the 'army will protect us'. When Bucharest practically turned into a warzone, state television aired scenes where soldiers were fighting valiantly against subversive elements with the aid of civilians, thus boosting the morale of countless others who barricaded themselves at home.
After hostilities finally ended on 27th December 1989, the new and improved Românǎ de Televiziune (TVR) run by the new regime took the opportunity to parade their most valuable catches to date: Nicolae and Elena Ceausescu themselves! After failing to flee the country, they were caught by the people and the military and tried in a kangaroo court. After conviction and execution, their corpses were filmed and aired live to every working televsion set in Romania to the delight of everyone who was watching. They applauded the deaths of the infamous couple and hoped that the new year would usher in a prosperous new future for all Romanians and generations to come.
In conclusion, television in Romania during that volatile period was totally different from the one we are used to watching. There were no rehearsed scripts, no actors, no propaganda for that matter. Only the truth was shown the moment communism collapsed in the impoverished state; the moment when that helicopted took off carrying Nicolae and Elena with it. All in all, television gave the opportunity to Romanians to be a part of history and to feel for themselves what it meant to be free once more from the grip of tyranny. For the millions more who did not take to streets of Bucharest, it did not mean they could not sing and cheer together with those who fought and died in the name of democracy. That, my friends, could not have been made possible without the help of television.
P.S.: I found a video of Nicolae and Elena on trial in the kangaroo court, with audio! Now we can listen to how he actually defended himself.
8 comments:
My friends from Romania said:
I was born in 91 so i don't know too many things but my dad told me a few things about revolution that might help you.He was in army stage that time and one division out of his company was sent at Baneasa airport to free it from "terrorists".But the thing was there was no threat at the airport and the soldiers there were announced that a bus of terrorists was approaching them which was in fact the divison sent from my dad's company.It all ended as a massacre between Romanian soldiers wrong informed.But why they were informed that way?To create chaos,to spill blood and finally to change the regime(which in my opinion wasn't too bad excepting the freedom which was restricted).After that a corrupted democracy was installed,and that's why Romania it's a country with high rate of corruption even these days...
Well, I think this is very interesting. One epic fail govt after another!
Another comment by a Romanian:
Uh i just asked my dad about it,he said that the televison informed the population about Ceausescu and he's escape after the riot at Bucharest.The population was also informed about where were the fights between the army and revolutioners.After what he told me i don't think the televison played an important role during the revolution cause the media was censored before revolution and the revolutionary ideas circulated by oral way as the people that opposed the regime were punished,so they didn't want to leave traces...
Now , being on topic , I for one am really surprised that foreigners are interested in our history since our country always was the bottom feeder in the European circle,changing sides like a bitch every time it was in trouble with the nazies or communists just to keep her ass safe.Those that didn't stood up to the war and ass licked the enemy , are the grand grand grand grand grand grand grand fathers of today's little morons with no dignity or no promising future.
I'm not very familiar to what happened in '89 since I was born in March 89 but I never closed my ears when it came to that period. El_guet is doing a good job but seriously...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romanian_revolution
Another respondent:
Romanian revolution started in Timisoara 2 weeks before it spreaded in the whole country, mainly in Bucharest our capital, i was born in 86, as i remember i was a lil kid, that my father went to help with defence in a military base, Who were the attackers?no1 knows, we were our own attackers?? maby not, maby US was involved in this revolution, like in the other comunist countries, maby i am wrong, maby i tell the truth, anyway Ceausescu and Elena were masacrated, it was a bad thing, but maby just their death could stop the comunism, after revolution, was chaos, everybody were stealing, and this method is used even today by the politicians, and bussenise people who are hand in hand with the politicians, the coruption is still very high rate sadly, but as i can see we are heading to a better place, things start to turn like they should had turned 15 years ago, we are climbing slowly to were we used to be, one of the top 10 countries in Europe.
To what extent do you think almost all our (post World War Two, urbanised, modern people) experiences of the world are mediated by the mass media?
Very interesting You Tube finds.
In my honest opinion, I would say the mass media mediates every piece of news that comes along, local and international alike. They (the reporters, journalists) are the ones who can actually 'mould' certain information into something that could be relayed to the public.
So the relationship that we have with the mass media would be:
News --> Mass Media --> Us
They are the mediators, the people in between. The mass media is a mechanism which acts as an intermediate agent to convey messages.
But then again, the general consumer of news will find it hard to differentiate between what news is true and what is fabricated. So I would say that the mass media is not only a mediator, but can also be a manipulator of reality.
Perhaps it should be formulated in this way instead: World/facts -> <- Media -> Individuals/Communities/Nation-states
And instead of the notion of manipulation (of course there is a lot of "propaganda") perhaps we can use the more neutral notion of "construction".
Indeed its been theorised that all social reality is "constructed" and that the primary modality for that mediation is "language" even before it takes specific expression (religion, mass media, political ideology).
social reality -> <- mass media -> <- audience
In fact "social reality" is always already "constructed" since there is no way out of language.
Will point you to some important sociological and philosophical works which deal with this.
Remind me when we next meet.
Thanks for the input. I think what you say makes perfect sense =D
OK I will certainly bring this topic up next week.
Post a Comment